ARTICLE
2 May 2023

OCR Announces Proposed Rulemaking To Strengthen Reproductive Health Privacy

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On April 12, 2023, OCR issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("NPRM") to strengthen HIPAA's protections around reproductive health care privacy.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Sara Helene Shanti’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

Listen to this post

On April 12, 2023, OCR issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("NPRM") to strengthen HIPAA's protections around reproductive health care privacy. The NPRM responds to President Biden's Executive Order 14076, which directed HHS to consider ways to strengthen privacy protections for reproductive health care services, following the Supreme Court's rule in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade and ultimately resulting in renewed concern over patient privacy and reproductive healthcare.

Under the NPRM, the use or disclosure of PHI would be prohibited for a criminal, civil, or administrative investigation into, or proceeding against, any person seeking, obtaining, providing, or facilitating lawful reproductive health care, in the following circumstances.

The prohibition would apply where reproductive health care is sought, obtained, provided, or facilitated in a state where health care is lawful, and outside of the state where an investigation or proceeding is authorized, e.g., if a resident of one state traveled to another state to receive a legal abortion. Additionally, it applies where reproductive health care is protected, required, or expressly authorized under federal law, such as miscarriage management required under EMTALA. Finally, the prohibition would apply where reproductive health care is lawfully provided in the state where the investigation or proceeding is authorized.

OCR clarified that the proposed rule would continue to allow uses and disclosures of PHI permitted by HIPAA, with the caveat that the request for PHI is not made to investigate or impose liability in connection with seeking, providing, or facilitating health care. A regulated entity would be required to sign an attestation when receiving a request to disclose PHI for: health oversight activities; judicial and administrative proceedings; law enforcement purposes; and disclosures to coroners and medical examiners.

The NPRM is a robust indicator of OCR's intent to broadly extend additional privacy protections for reproductive health care for all genders. HHS has defined reproductive health care to include, but not be limited, to treatment related to prenatal care, abortion, miscarriage management, infertility treatment, contraception use, and treatment for reproductive-related conditions such as ovarian cancer. HHS encouraged all stakeholders to submit public comments on the NPRM. The fact sheet regarding the NPRM can be accessed here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More