ARTICLE
29 March 2024

CFPB Issues Guidance On Deceptive Practices By Remittance Transfer Providers

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On March 27, the CFPB issued Circular 2024-02, which warns that remittance providers may be liable under the CFPA for certain deceptive marketing...
United States Finance and Banking
This article from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP is most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking topic(s)
  • in China
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On March 27, the CFPB issued Circular 2024-02, which warns that remittance providers may be liable under the CFPA for certain deceptive marketing practices related to the speed or cost of sending a remittance transfer. Under EFTA's "Remittance Rule," (Subpart B of Regulation E), the term "remittance transfer" includes most electronic transfers of funds sent by consumers in the United States to recipients in other countries. Alarmingly, the Bureau notes that providers may be liable irrespective of whether they are in compliance with the Remittance Rule's disclosure requirements. The Bureau's circular singles out the following advertising practices by remittance providers as potentially deceptive in violation of the CFPA:

  • Marketing remittance transfers as being delivered within a certain time frame, when transfers actually take longer to be made available to recipients;
  • Marketing remittance transfers as "free" when they are not in fact free, or as "no fee" when the provider does in fact charge fees (even if the terms and conditions are spelled out in the fine print or later in the transaction); and
  • Marketing promotional fees or promotional exchange rates for remittance transfers without sufficiently clarifying when an offer is temporary or limited.

The guidance provided in the Circular applies not only to traditional providers of international money transfers, but also to digital wallet providers that offer the capability to send money internationally from the United States. Even though the Bureau's circular focuses on remittances, it tied its release to the agency's focus on so-called junk fees.

Note that CFPB circulars are statements of policy under the Administrative Procedures Act. While they do not impose any legal requirements on external parties, they advise market participants how they see applicable law on a particular topic and how they would enforce it.

Putting it into Practice: The circular follows recent CFPB enforcement actions targeting providers of international money transfers (see previous blog post here) and its Spring 2022 Supervisory Highlights detailing findings that providers of international money transfers made false and misleading representations about the speed of remittance transfers. The Bureau's circular is a warning not just to remittance providers, but to all financial services companies as it once again highlights the Bureau's ever expansive UDAAP authority, this time to tackle company advertising and marketing practices.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More