ARTICLE
25 January 2021

Broker-Dealer Settles FINRA Charges For Supervisory Failures Over RMBS Transactions

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

Broker-Dealer Settles FINRA Charges for Supervisory Failures over RMBS Transactions.
United States Finance and Banking

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to adequately address red flags arising from residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") transactions negotiated by one of the broker-dealer's associated persons.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA alleged that one of the broker-dealer's registered representatives made misleading statements to counterparties regarding available bid or offer prices in relation to the sale and purchase of 11 RMBS. FINRA also stated that the broker-dealer's written supervisory procedures ("WSPs") mandated the review of nine of the RMBS transactions, as they surpassed the markup margin for RMBS. FINRA found that the broker-dealer failed to conduct further investigation upon learning that, in several of the flagged transactions:

  • the same registered representative was on both sides of such transactions;
  • the representative negotiated directly with counterparties in order to obtain the greatest spreads for the broker-dealer;
  • only the representative had firsthand access to the bids or offer prices sent by the counterparties; and
  • highly variant profits were generated in "a highly illiquid and opaque market."

As a result, FINRA found that the broker-dealer did not reasonably review the transactions or supervise the registered representative and determined that the broker-dealer violated NASD Rule 3010 and FINRA Rule 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to a censure and a $250,000 fine.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: Amherst Pierpont Securities LLC

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More