United States: Contracts and Commercial Law

Oilfield service firms responding to the Dallas Fed Energy Survey for the third quarter of 2026 reported substantially broader increases in input costs than in the prices they received. The input-cost index was 60.4, compared with a prices-received index of 16.3. Each index represents the percentage of respondents reporting an increase minus the percentage reporting a decrease.

When structuring an earnout in a middle-market M&A transaction, the choice between gross revenue and EBITDA as the underlying metric can determine whether the deal creates value or triggers post-closing disputes. Each metric measures fundamentally different aspects of financial performance and carries distinct legal and operational risks that both buyers and sellers must carefully navigate.

When sophisticated parties to a restructuring agreement provide that a fee is triggered if a debtor “raises, or “commits to raise” alternative financing, does the word “commits” require a binding contractual obligation or something less? The First Department addressed this very question in a recent decision entitled Aurelius Capital Master Ltd. v Hertz International Limited, 2026 NY Slip Op 05369 (1st Dept Sept. 22, 2026). The 4-1 decision affirmed a post-trial judgment of approximately $15.9 million in favor of holders of unsecured notes issued by a Hertz affiliate, holding that “commits to raise” encompasses significant affirmative steps toward securing alternative financing, even absent a binding agreement.