- within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
- with Finance and Tax Executives
- in United States
- with readers working within the Technology and Oil & Gas industries
When most business owners think about legal disputes, breach of contract is the first claim that comes to mind. After all, contracts are the backbone of commercial relationships, and when one party fails to live up to its promises, the other party often turns to the courts for relief.
However, in commercial litigation, a breach of contract is rarely the whole story. Depending on the facts of the case, additional legal claims may be available that can increase the scope of damages, expand the legal remedies, or provide leverage in settlement negotiations. Understanding these potential claims is critical for both plaintiffs and defendants.
Fraud and Misrepresentation in Business Transactions
A straightforward breach of contract may become much more serious if the non-performing party made false statements to induce the other side to enter the agreement.
Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one party knowingly makes false statements of material fact with the intent to deceive.
Negligent misrepresentation may apply when false information is provided carelessly, without proper due diligence, under a relationship that requires disclosure.
Fraud claims may entitle the injured party to rescission of the contract (undoing the deal) and, in some cases, punitive damages—remedies not available in a standard breach of contract action. For example, if a vendor exaggerated its ability to deliver a product on time in order to secure the contract, a fraud claim could significantly increase liability.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Disputes
Certain business relationships go beyond ordinary contractual obligations. Corporate officers, LLC managers, partners in a partnership, and sometimes joint venture participants owe fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, and good faith to one another.
If the contract dispute arises within such a relationship, the injured party may allege a breach of fiduciary duty alongside breach of contract. These claims often allow for broader damages, including disgorgement of profits wrongfully obtained, rather than merely compensating for direct financial loss.
Tortious Interference with Contract or Business Expectancy
Illinois law recognizes that a third party can be held liable for intentionally interfering with contractual or prospective business relationships. Two common claims are:
- Tortious interference with contract: when someone intentionally induces a party to breach a valid, enforceable contract.
- Tortious interference with prospective economic advantage (business expectancy): when someone disrupts ongoing negotiations or anticipated deals, even before a contract is finalized.
These tort claims may apply, for example, if a competitor encourages a vendor to break its supply contract with your company, or if a former employee misuses inside information to disrupt your client relationships.
Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit
Sometimes, a contract may be invalid, incomplete, or unenforceable for technical reasons. In those cases, the law allows parties to seek recovery under equitable doctrines such as unjust enrichment or quantum meruit.
- Unjust enrichment prevents one party from unfairly benefiting at another's expense.
- Quantum meruit allows recovery for the reasonable value of services provided.
These claims often serve as a safety net when contractual remedies alone do not adequately compensate the injured party.
Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
Even when not expressly stated, every contract carries an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. This means that, where there is ambiguity in the contract, each party must not act in a way that unfairly undermines the bargain. For instance, if a franchisor technically complies with the contract but deliberately withholds critical marketing support to pressure the franchisee into renegotiating terms, a claim for breach of the implied covenant could supplement the standard breach of contract action.
Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices (ICFA) and Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (UDTPA)
Illinois has one of the strongest consumer protection statutes in the country: the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (ICFA). Although often thought of in a consumer context, ICFA also protects businesses against unfair methods of competition and deceptive trade practices. The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (UDTPA) protects against certain misstatements concerning the goods or services provided. If a contractual dispute involves misrepresentations, concealment, or unfair conduct, ICFA and UDTPA claims can add significant leverage because they allow for attorneys' fees, punitive damages, and injunctive relief.
Conversion or Civil Theft
When one party wrongfully exercises control over property belonging to another, such as misusing company funds, retaining equipment after termination of a contract, or diverting inventory, Illinois law recognizes claims for conversion or, in some cases, statutory civil theft. These claims allow recovery beyond the scope of contract damages and can also include punitive damages.
Accounting and Constructive Trust
In business relationships, particularly among partners or co-owners, a breach of contract claim may be accompanied by requests for an accounting or a constructive trust.
- An accounting requires the breaching party to provide a full, transparent record of transactions.
- A constructive trust may be imposed to ensure that wrongfully obtained profits or assets are held for the benefit of the rightful owner.
These remedies are especially useful when the breach involves misuse of shared funds or co-owned property.
Why Additional Claims Matter in Business Litigation
From a strategic perspective, layering additional claims onto a breach of contract action can:
- Expand available remedies (e.g., punitive damages, rescission, attorneys' fees).
- Increase settlement leverage by raising the potential risks for the defendant.
- Provide alternative paths to recovery if the contract is found unenforceable.
- Highlight misconduct beyond a simple business mistake, which can resonate with judges and juries.
However, it is equally important to evaluate whether these claims are legally and factually supported, since courts may dismiss unsupported allegations and, in some cases, impose sanctions for frivolous claims.
A breach of contract is often just the starting point in litigation. Depending on the facts, claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, consumer fraud, unjust enrichment, and more may come into play.
Do not assume that a dispute is "just" a contract issue. The legal landscape may be broader, and the potential risks and remedies more significant, than you initially expect.
Frequently Asked Questions About Business Dispute Claims in Illinois
Can I sue for more than just breach of contract in Illinois?
es. If the breach involved fraud, deception, or a violation of trust, you may be able to file additional claims such as fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, or conversion.
What is the difference between breach of contract and fraud?
breach of contract is a failure to fulfill a promise made in an agreement. Fraud involves an intentional false statement made to deceive the other party into signing the contract or taking action. Fraud claims can lead to punitive damages, whereas contract claims typically cover only financial losses.
Does the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act apply to businesses?
Yes. The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (ICFA) protects businesses, not just individual consumers, against unfair competition and deceptive practices by other companies.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
