ARTICLE
19 September 2013

Off-Set And Private Sale Options In The New Capital Markets Law

P
Paksoy

Contributor

Paksoy is an Istanbul-based independent Turkish law firm with over 120 employees, offering legal advice and counselling to foreign investors and the Turkish business community. We provide a wide range of services to meet the needs of local and international businesses in almost every field, including corporate law, capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, competition law, banking and finance, tax, real estate and project development, project finance, energy and infrastructure, litigation and arbitration.
Prior to the new Capital Markets Law, enforcing a security by means of a private sale, other than through foreclosure proceedings before a court, was questionable.
Turkey Corporate/Commercial Law
Togan Turan’s articles from Paksoy are most popular:
  • in India
  • with readers working within the Oil & Gas industries
Paksoy are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law, Intellectual Property and Employment and HR topic(s)

By virtue of Article 47 of the new Capital Markets Law, Turkish legal markets have welcomed the possibility of using a private sale to enforce a security in case of a default by either an offset mechanism against the debts and/or obligations of a debtor or the sale of capital markets instruments (i.e., pledged shares) on the stock exchange.

Prior to the new Capital Markets Law, enforcing a security by means of a private sale, other than through foreclosure proceedings before a court, was questionable. A private sale was accepted in Turkish legal doctrine only in concept and was considered within the context of an up-front contractual agreement between the collateral provider and taker whereby the collateral taker is given the right in a relevant security agreement to enforce its right in the collateral and cause it to be sold privately. Due to the contractual nature of such an agreement, this method fell outside the scope of bankruptcy law.

According to Article 47, security agreements, the subject of which is a capital markets instrument (e.g., shares of a publicly held company), must be made in written form. The ownership of the instrument remains with the pledgor unless it is explicitly stated in the relevant security agreement that the ownership/title of the instrument is being transferred to the possession of the pledgee. In case of an event of default or any other contractual or legal enforcement event, the pledgee is entitled to enforce its security interest through the private sale of the capital markets instrument, and may reimburse the sale proceeds received in excess of the value of the obligation, if any, to the debtor. In addition, Article 47 provides a set-off mechanism for the pledgee that enables the pledgee to take ownership of the capital markets instrument in satisfaction of the debtor's obligations. In case of a security agreement where the title of the collateral has not been transferred to the collateral taker, the collateral taker may request title to the capital markets instrument upon an event of default or any other legal or contractual enforcement event in addition to its right to a private sale.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More