ARTICLE
7 October 2025

Court Of Appeal, October 2, 2025, Decision, UPC_CoA_764/2024, 774/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Whether the subject matter of the granted claim extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed is determined by considering what information...
Luxembourg Intellectual Property
Nobuchika Mamine’s articles from Bardehle Pagenberg are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property topic(s)

1. Key takeaways

Added matter standard – directly and unambiguously derivable

Whether the subject matter of the granted claim extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed is determined by considering what information a person skilled in the art, based on objective considerations and referring to the filing date and using its general technical knowledge, would directly and unambiguously derive from the entirety of the application as filed. This includes implicitly disclosed subject matter that follows clearly and unambiguously from what is expressly mentioned.

Divisionals – added matter standard applies to both parent and grant parent

In case of a divisional application, the added matter standard applies to each earlier application. The subject matter of the granted claim must not extend beyond (1) the disclosure of the originally filed application for the patent AND (2) the disclosure of the original PCT application.

2. Division

Court of Appeal

3. UPC number

UPC_CoA_764/2024, UPC_CoA_774/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Appeal decision (1st instance proceedings: LD Düsseldorf, decision of October 10, 2024, UPC_CFI_363/2023)

5. Parties

expert e-Commerce GmbH, expert klein GmbH (appellants / defendants in 1st instance infringement proceedings)

Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (respondent / claimant in 1st instance infringement proceedings)

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 926 698

7. Jurisdictions

UPC, Court of Appeal, Luxembourg

CoA Order 2025-10-02 expert klein v Seoul Viosys CoA 774 2024

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More