Article
Beyond Ahluwalia: Practical Considerations For Litigating IPV Claims
When the Supreme Court of Canada established the new tort of intimate partner violence (“IPV”) in Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia,[1] it answered a call to action to address and provide a remedy to the coercion, control, and systemic harm that results from this pervasive form of abuse. In the wake of the decision, family and civil lawyers now have to figure out how to effectively litigate these cases. How should they be pleaded? What evidence will courts find persuasive? How much corroboration is necessary?
Lerners LLP