ARTICLE
21 June 2021

Nevada Broadens Its Privacy Law

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
Nevada's governor recently approved an amendment to their privacy law. As we covered previously, generally, this law affords consumers a right to opt out of the "sale" of their data to third parties.
United States Nevada Privacy
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

Nevada's governor recently approved an amendment to their privacy law. As we covered previously, generally, this law affords consumers a right to opt out of the "sale" of their data to third parties.  The amendment broadens (1) the scope of the law to also apply to "data brokers" and (2) consumers right to opt-out of sale. The changes are expected to go into effect October 1, 2021.

Nevada is the not the first state to regulate "data brokers." California and Vermont also have laws that apply to companies that are in the business of buying and selling information about consumers. In Nevada, a data broker is defined as "a person whose primary business is purchasing covered information about consumers with whom the person does not have a direct relationship and who reside in this State from operators or other data brokers and making sales of such covered information."

Nevada's previous definition of "sale" was relatively narrow in scope, requiring that there be an exchange for monetary consideration and an onward license or sale of the data to other third parties. While still not as broad as "sale" under California's CCPA (which defines sale to also include "other valuable consideration"), the amendment removes the requirement that the exchange be for the purpose of the other person licensing or selling covered information to additional persons. Thus, Nevada still maintains the requirement that there be "monetary consideration" which aligns more closely to Virginia's impending privacy law.

Putting it into practice. While the amendments to Nevada's law likely will not significantly broaden what activities might constitute a "sale," companies should still confirm that any existing disclosures in privacy policies about Nevada's law remain accurate in light of these changes. Data brokers should also review and assess whether any existing processes will need to be updated.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More