ARTICLE
28 July 2026

EEOC Moves Forward With Proposal To End EEO-1 Reporting

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
Morgan McDonald is a legal professional at Foley & Lardner LLP based in Chicago. Her contact information and professional profile are featured on the firm's website, providing direct access to her expertise and services.
United States Employment and HR
Morgan McDonald-Ramos’s articles from Foley & Lardner are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • in Ireland
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries

In our earlier post, With the EEOC Poised to End EEO-1 Reporting, What’s Next for Employers?, we discussed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) anticipated effort to end mandatory EEO-1 reporting. The EEOC has now taken the next step: on July 21, 2026, it issued a proposed rule that would rescind regulations requiring EEO-1 and other workforce demographic reports.

For private employers, the key takeaway is that this remains only a proposal. Current EEO-1 obligations are still in place unless and until a final rule says otherwise. Employers should therefore continue current compliance efforts and avoid making immediate changes to demographic data collection or recordkeeping practices based solely on this development.

The proposed rule would eliminate reporting requirements for EEO-1 through EEO-6 reports and would also remove certain recordkeeping rules tied specifically to preparing those reports. That said, broader personnel record retention obligations would remain in place, particularly where a charge or other employment claim is involved.

As we noted previously, employers also should not assume that a change to federal EEO-1 reporting would eliminate all demographic data compliance considerations. Depending on the employer and jurisdiction, other federal, state, or local requirements may still apply, and some employers may still choose to collect or maintain demographic for other compliance or business purposes.

We will continue to monitor the EEOC’s rulemaking process and provide updates as developments occur.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More