ARTICLE
11 December 2025

SDNY Offers Companies Facing Investigation New Incentives For Quick Self-Disclosure

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) recently discussed new incentives for corporate cooperation and self-disclosure for companies facing criminal investigations.
United States New York Criminal Law
William Brady’s articles from Holland & Knight are most popular:
  • within Criminal Law topic(s)
  • with Finance and Tax Executives
  • in United Arab Emirates
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries

Highlights

  • The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) recently discussed new incentives for corporate cooperation and self-disclosure for companies facing criminal investigations.
  • Corporations would be eligible for benefits such as a deferred prosecution agreement from the start and possibly other benefits.
  • This is part of the U.S. Department of Justice's efforts to incentivize companies that are under investigation or become aware of criminal conduct to self-disclose.

Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) discussed corporate cooperation and self-disclosure in a fireside chat at the New York City Bar Association's annual International White Collar Symposium on Dec. 2, 2025. During an informal Q&A session, Clayton told the audience that his office is prepared to offer "real benefits" to corporations facing criminal investigations if they quickly agree to cooperate and compensate victims – with an emphasis on speed. Among the new benefits Clayton floated for early cooperation was a deferred prosecution for the corporation up front, following disclosure, but contingent on its continued cooperation. He also dangled the prospect of enhanced terms down the road.

This is the latest example of the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) efforts to encourage companies that are under investigation or become aware of criminal conduct to self-disclose, with expanded incentives for doing so. It follows the DOJ's recent revisions, in March 2025, to the Criminal Division's Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP). (See Holland & Knight's previous alert, "DOJ Announces New Policies and Priorities in Prosecution of White Collar Crime," May 15, 2025). Those changes were aimed at incentivizing companies that "self-disclose, fully cooperate, timely and appropriately remediate and have no aggravating circumstances" by offering them declination – an agreement from the DOJ not to pursue charges.

Key Takeaways

Prompt Disclosure. "Time matters," Clayton stressed to the group. "If the corporation says we're going to cooperate but still takes five years to get to the end of it, that's not cooperation."

Quick Resolution. He also stressed his desire for a quick resolution, unless the clients are "intentionally trying to hide [something]." "[I]f we can get the bad actors out, get a remedy and, most importantly, compensate the victims quickly, that's the kind of corporate cooperation program that I want to see."

Prompt Compensation to Victims. Clayton also stressed the importance of prompt compensation to victims and how early disclosure can play an important role toward these efforts. Speaking hypothetically, Clayton explained that in a scenario where someone is defrauded out of $100, and the government can return $70 immediately, "that's a lot better than getting them $90 in five years."

Potential Benefits to Cooperating Companies. In exchange for "quickly" disclosing misconduct, identifying potentially culpable actors, turning over relevant evidence and compensating victims, Clayton suggested that corporations would be eligible for a deferred prosecution agreement from the start (subject to ongoing cooperation) and possibly other benefits, including government-wide resolutions of collateral issues (for example, assistance with other agency action, such as industry bars). Additional benefits might include little or no financial penalties for genuine enforcement assistance.

Although Clayton did not explain just how quickly is "quickly," the emphasis on timeliness was noted. Though it is no surprise that the DOJ would want companies to disclose any information they may have voluntarily and sooner rather than later, companies facing such decisions must carefully assess the relevant facts and risks (which are substantial). It is interesting to note that during this talk, Clayton also shared that gun crimes and drugs are the SDNY Criminal Division's top priorities.

Conclusion

It appears that the DOJ is increasingly relying on carrots rather than sticks to encourage companies to self-disclose and cooperate. Time will tell if this approach proves effective in promoting increased cooperation and quicker resolutions in corporate investigations and potential prosecutions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More