ARTICLE
13 August 2026

Cutting To The Chase — A Faster Route Through Arbitration? Matthew Wescott And Yana Ahlden Write In ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE Magazine

Section 39A of the Arbitration Act 1996, introduced through the 2025 reforms, gives tribunals a potent new mechanism to dismiss claims with no real prospect of success. The promise: quicker, leaner arbitrations. The risks: due-process challenges, enforceability concerns, and tension with stricter institutional rules.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
PCB Byrne’s articles from PCB Byrne are most popular:
  • within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • in India
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Media & Information and Transport industries
PCB Byrne are most popular:
  • within Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Technology and Employment and HR topic(s)

Section 39A of the Arbitration Act 1996, introduced through the 2025 reforms, gives tribunals a potent new mechanism to dismiss claims with no real prospect of success. The promise: quicker, leaner arbitrations. The risks: due-process challenges, enforceability concerns, and tension with stricter institutional rules.

For clients and practitioners, this development reshapes both arbitration strategy and clause-drafting. Used well, Section 39A can eliminate weak claims early. Used badly, it may lead to setbacks, cost consequences, or challenges under the New York Convention.

Read the full analysis by Matthew Wescott and Yana Ahlden, published in ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE Magazine – Women in FIRE Supplement, Issue 23. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More