ARTICLE
27 January 2026

Acronym Trademarks In Taiwan: Key Lessons For IP Practitioners

CT
Chang Tsi & Partners

Contributor

Chang Tsi & Partners is a "National Outstanding Law Firm (nominated by Ministry of Justice of China)" with a strong reputation in intellectual property and litigation.

Since its establishment in 2002, Chang Tsi & Partners has become one of the leading law firms in China. The firm has constantly been referred to as a “National Outstanding Law Firm”, “The Best IP Law Firm in China”, “China IP Law Firm” and “Tier 1 IP Law Firm of the Year” by the Ministry of Justice of China, international legal directories and various business magazines such as the Chambers Asia Pacific, The Asia Pacific Legal 500 as well as Asialaw Profiles.

Acronym trademarks are widely used by international brands for their simplicity and versatility.
Taiwan Intellectual Property
Chang Tsi & Partners are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Technology and Antitrust/Competition Law topic(s)
  • with Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Transport and Law Firm industries

Acronym trademarks are widely used by international brands for their simplicity and versatility. However, in Taiwan, such marks often face heightened scrutiny—particularly when they derive from descriptive or commonly used terms.

A recent administrative judgment by Taiwan's Intellectual Property and Commercial Court (2024 Xing-Shang-Su-Zi No. 43) provides helpful guidance on how acronym trademarks are assessed in practice.

The court reaffirmed that acronyms are not inherently unregistrable, but their protection depends heavily on how they are perceived by the relevant public. Where an acronym is easily understood as an abbreviation of descriptive wording, it is likely to be considered lacking inherent distinctiveness unless supported by convincing evidence of acquired distinctiveness.
Notably, the court emphasized that evidence of use must demonstrate genuine consumer recognition. Mere internal use, limited exposure, or fragmented marketing materials will not suffice.

Practical Takeaways for IP Attorneys

  • Acronyms derived from descriptive terms are inherently high-risk filings in Taiwan
  • Distinctiveness is assessed contextually, based on goods/services and consumer perception
  • Evidence of secondary meaning must show sustained, market-facing use
  • Acronym marks often enjoy a narrower scope of protection, even after registration
  • Combining acronyms with distinctive word or device elements can strengthen registrability and enforcement

Why This Matters

As global branding increasingly favors short-form identifiers, this case highlights the importance of aligning trademark strategy with local standards. In Taiwan, brevity in branding must be matched with clarity in distinctiveness.

Understanding how acronym trademarks are evaluated can make the difference between a smooth registration and a costly dispute.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More