ARTICLE
23 December 2024

When Does The Clock Start Running For Wrongful Pregnancy Claims?

FW
Fairbridges

Contributor

Fairbridges is a leading African law firm providing expert corporate and commercial legal services across South Africa and beyond. With offices in Cape Town and Johannesburg, we assist both local and multinational companies - our areas of expertise include commercial legal advisory, transactional work, commercial drafting, competition law (regulatory filings and litigation), intellectual property law, insurance and medical malpractice, healthcare regulatory advice, and commercial litigation. Our firm’s history (we were established in 1812) provides us with a rich legacy of institutional knowledge and a commitment to service excellence. This deep-rooted experience enables us to offer clients tailored, professional, and high-quality legal services at competitive rates. At Fairbridges, we pride ourselves on our ability to adapt to the evolving legal environment, embrace innovation and uphold the highest standards of the legal profession.
Rensburg and Another v Cilliers (1705/2021) [2024] ZAFSHC 290. In South Africa, the legal doctrine of prescription generally gives a creditor three years to recover a debt.
South Africa Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Julia Penn’s articles from Fairbridges are most popular:
  • in European Union
Fairbridges are most popular:
  • within Immigration topic(s)

Rensburg and Another v Cilliers (1705/2021) [2024] ZAFSHC 290. In South Africa, the legal doctrine of prescription generally gives a creditor three years to recover a debt. But in medical negligence cases, determining when a claim "becomes due" is often pivotal. This crucial timing affects whether a claim falls within the permissible period to take legal action and hinges on when the claimant has a fully developed cause of action, meaning when they become aware of all facts necessary to prove the claim.

In Truter and Another v Deysel 2006 (4) SA 168 (SCA), the court held that a plaintiff's cause of action is complete from the moment any damage is suffered. This applies not only to the immediate loss but also to future losses arising from the same incident. This principle is closely aligned with the "once and for all rule" (seen in Evins v Shield Insurance Co Ltd 1980 (2) 814 (AD)), which mandates that plaintiffs claim all damages, current and prospective, from a single cause of action.

In the recent Rensburg and Another v Cilliers case, the plaintiffs sought damages for their minor child's support, arguing that the child's conception resulted from the defendant's negligent sterilisation procedure. The key question was when their claim actually began to run: was it at conception, when costs related to the pregnancy began, or at the child's birth, as argued by the plaintiffs?

The court ruled that the claim began when the plaintiffs became aware of the conception, not the child's birth. The birth itself was not the wrongful act; rather, it was the conception that triggered potential damages. Since the plaintiffs knew all relevant facts by January 30, 2018, their claim had expired by the time they filed suit.

This case serves as a reminder: for both claimants and defendants, early risk assessment is essential to manage claims within South Africa's strict prescription periods.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More