ARTICLE
22 April 2026

Landmark CJEU Ruling: Invoice Date Cannot Delay VAT Deduction

GGI Global Alliance

Contributor

GGI is the leading global alliance of independent accounting, law, and advisory firms. With approximately 900 offices in 120+ countries, GGI member firms are committed to providing clients with specialist solutions for their international business requirements.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that Polish VAT regulations unlawfully restrict taxpayers' right to deduct input VAT by making it dependent on invoice receipt dates rather than possession at filing time. This landmark decision addresses how EU member states can impose formal requirements on VAT deductions and examines the balance between tax collection measures and fundamental principles of VAT neutrality and proportionality.
Poland Tax
GGI Global Alliance are most popular:
  • within Environment, Strategy and International Law topic(s)
  • in Australia

In its landmark judgment of 11 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that Polish VAT regulations regarding the right to deduct VAT are incompatible with EU law. Polish VAT regulations stipulate that the right to deduct input VAT arises dependent on the date the invoice is actually received from the supplier. In contrast, the VAT Directive requires only that the taxpayer be in possession of the invoice at the time of filing the VAT return.

Under the legal framework applicable prior to the CJEU ruling, if a taxpayer purchased goods for business purposes on 30 May but the supplier issued the invoice on 10 June, the taxpayer could not deduct VAT for the month of acquisition. Instead, the deduction could be made no earlier than for the VAT return covering June. In practice, this meant that taxpayers bore the negative consequences of their counterparties’ delays. Moreover, in certain cases, such limitations could have a significant adverse impact on companies’ cash flow.

The CJEU emphasised that the right to deduct VAT depends on fulfilling both substantive requirements (relating to the basis and scope of the right) and formal requirements laid down in the VAT Directive. According to the Court’s settled jurisprudence, and in light of the principles of VAT neutrality and proportionality, the right to deduct must be granted where all substantive requirements are met, even if certain formal requirements have not been complied with.

This means that the emergence of the right to deduct VAT may depend solely on substantive conditions provided for in the VAT Directive. The possession of an invoice should be classified as a formal requirement. However, under Article 178 of the VAT Directive, the taxpayer may exercise the right to deduct only once they are in possession of the invoice. It should be emphasised that the “arising of the right” and the “possibility to exercise the right” are two distinct concepts.

Polish provisions made the very existence of the right to deduct VAT dependent on the receipt of an invoice. The Polish legislator thus unlawfully extended the conditions for the emergence of that right, contrary to the VAT Directive. Furthermore, pursuant to Article 167 of the VAT Directive, the right to deduct should, as a rule, be exercised for the same period in which it arises.

The CJEU also rejected the argument of the Director of the National Revenue Information that linking the right to deduct VAT to the receipt of an invoice was justified under Article 273 of the VAT Directive as a measure to ensure proper tax collection and prevent tax fraud. The Court found that this solution infringed upon the principle of proportionality.

In conclusion, the judgment will have a positive impact on the business environment in Poland. For example, if a taxpayer acquires goods on 30 September and receives the invoice on 15 October, they will be entitled to deduct VAT on the VAT return covering September. In practice, this means that many taxpayers will be able to deduct VAT one month earlier, which may improve their cash flow.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More