ARTICLE
8 January 2026

What If My Lawyer Doesn't Agree With Me?

BB
Beresford Booth

Contributor

Beresford Booth is a full-service law firm in the Seattle area. Our clients include startups, high-growth companies, established businesses, families and individuals. We offer a full range of civil legal services in the areas of business, real estate, family law, adoption & assisted reproduction, estate planning & probate, litigation and employment law.
It can feel encouraging and validating to consult a lawyer who happens to see your case exactly how you do. When a lawyer and client are aligned in their view on a case...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Andrew M. McKenzie’s articles from Beresford Booth are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Construction & Engineering industries
Beresford Booth are most popular:
  • within Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Insurance and Consumer Protection topic(s)

It can feel encouraging and validating to consult a lawyer who happens to see your case exactly how you do. When a lawyer and client are aligned in their view on a case, it can mitigate potential conflicts in the relationship. But clients should take heed not to assume that lawyers are disloyal or the wrong fit because they see the case differently. In fact, a lawyer who demonstrates the courage to disagree with you may just be doing their job more effectively than one who tells you what you want to hear.

Lawyers wear different hats depending on the context of their work. Broadly speaking, the lawyer may be wearing the hat of counselor or advocate, and while the public may frequently conflate the two roles, they are very different.

Counselor

When the lawyer is communicating privately with a client, the lawyer's role is to be a counselor. The lawyer must provide their sound independent judgment to the client. This means the lawyer provides analysis and advice to the client, irrespective of whether that analysis is favorable or unfavorable, and whether or not it supports or conflicts with the client's theory of the case. Sometimes this will require telling a client that they are wrong, or that their understanding of the law is mistaken, or that they are not likely to prevail in their case. While such advice may feel deflating, in many instances it saves the client from greater heartache down the road. A lawyer's advice to a client not to pursue a contemplated course of action, when competently given, can be invaluable, and save time, money, risk, and emotional energy.

While it is a lawyer's prerogative to provide unbiased advice to the client, the client need not assume that the lawyer's opinion and legal analysis is the only valid one. Competent lawyers can certainly disagree among themselves on the viability of a client's position. Such disagreements frequently stem from, inter alia: (a) the fact that the law may not be fully developed in a particular area; (b) inconsistencies in existing precedents, including disagreements between courts; (c) reasonable disagreements concerning the interpretation and application of laws and precedents; (d) reasonable disagreements about the credibility of parties and witnesses; and (e) the lawyer's experience with similar cases in their own practice history. When your lawyer disagrees, it is OK for you to seek a second opinion from another lawyer, and this can sometimes provide you with additional insight.

Advocate

When the lawyer interacts with outside parties, such as a court, opposing party, or opposing counsel, the lawyer's role changes from counselor to advocate. Rather than elucidate the facts and law dispassionately and without regard to whom it favors, the lawyer must present the case in the light most favorable to the client, to the extent ethically possible. This will often mean highlighting favorable facts, discounting or explaining away unfavorable ones, presenting favorable legal authority, distinguishing unfavorable authority, and drawing inferences in the client's favor when possible.

Even when the lawyer functions in their role as advocate, keep in mind that they must still adhere to ethical limitations. By way of non-exhaustive examples, lawyers cannot misrepresent facts to a court, assist a client in committing perjury, destroy relevant evidence, etc. Lawyers must also refrain from making frivolous or disingenuous arguments in court, and must ensure that there is a good faith basis for their client's position, either rooted in existing law, or based upon a reasonable argument for a modification or extension of existing law. These limitations help preserve the integrity of our judicial system.

A good lawyer is not only a great advocate; they are also a great counselor. Remembering the distinction between these two roles can help clients appreciate the quality of their representation. Clients should understand the value of obtaining the lawyer's honest opinion, rather than the lawyer telling the client what the client wants to hear.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More