ARTICLE
19 February 2024

California Appeals Court Reinstates CPPA's Ability To Enforce CPRA Regulations—Effective Immediately

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3000 attorneys across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.
In a potentially significant development for companies subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended, on Feb. 9, California's Third District Court of Appeal overturned a Superior Court decision issued in June 2023 ...
United States California Privacy

In a potentially significant development for companies subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended (CCPA), on Feb. 9, California's Third District Court of Appeal overturned a Superior Court decision issued in June 2023 that had stayed the enforcement of new CCPA regulations finalized by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA), first-in-the-nation privacy regulator, previously discussed here. The result of the earlier decision was enforcement of the new CCPA regulations being delayed from July 1, 2023, to March 29, 2024, or one-year from the date the regulations were officially finalized. Following the appellate court's decision, now the CPPA may enforce the voluminous set of regulations effective immediately.

Another result of the appellate court's decision appears to be that the precedent for the CPPA having to wait one-year before enforcing new regulations is vacated. As the appellate court notes:

In any event, because there is no "explicit and forceful language" mandating that the Agency is prohibited from enforcing the Act until (at least) one year after the Agency approves final regulations, the trial court erred in concluding otherwise. [...] The Chamber was simply not entitled to the relief granted by the trial court. Accordingly, we will grant the Agency's petition for extraordinary writ relief and allow the trial court to consider any remaining issues concerning the propriety of compelling more prompt development of regulations.

In a statement released by the CPPA, the agency's Deputy Director of Enforcement noted, "This decision should serve as an important reminder to the regulated community: now would be a good time to review your privacy practices to ensure full compliance with all of our regulations."

It is unclear at this time whether the petitioners, the California Chamber of Commerce, will seek to petition for a rehearing or a review as part of further appellate process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More