ARTICLE
10 August 2026

Genentech Files BPCIA Patent Infringement Suit Against Biocon Over Proposed PERJETA Biosimilar

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
Genentech and Hoffmann-La Roche have filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Biocon Biologics concerning a proposed biosimilar to PERJETA, a treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The complaint alleges infringement of 28 patents and follows the BPCIA's pre-litigation "patent dance" procedures, with both parties having agreed on the list of patents to be asserted.
United States New Jersey Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Sarah Adam’s articles from Goodwin Procter LLP are most popular:
  • within Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Healthcare industries
Goodwin Procter LLP are most popular:
  • within Criminal Law, Strategy and Accounting and Audit topic(s)

On July 29, 2026, Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Biocon Biologics Inc. (“Biocon”) and related entities, alleging infringement of 28 patents relating to Genentech’s PERJETA and Biocon’s proposed biosimilar, Bmab1500. As we previously reported, Genentech had already challenged the same proposed biosimilar in a Section 337 complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission.

PERJETA is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, or “HER2-positive,” metastatic breast cancer. According to the complaint, Biocon submitted an abbreviated Biologics License Application (“aBLA”) seeking FDA approval to market Bmab1500 as a biosimilar to PERJETA.

The complaint alleges that Biocon infringed the asserted patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(C) by submitting its aBLA and seeking approval to manufacture and market Bmab1500 before the expiration of Genentech’s patents. Genentech asserts that, although the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) permits biosimilar applicants to rely on the reference product sponsor’s clinical studies and research data, it does not provide a license to infringe patents covering the reference product.

According to the complaint, Genentech and Biocon participated in the BPCIA’s pre-litigation information exchange and negotiation procedures, commonly referred to as the “patent dance.” On July 1, 2026, the parties agreed on the list of patents to be asserted in the litigation. Genentech filed its complaint within the applicable 30-day statutory period following that agreement.

Several of the asserted patents were also at issue in a separate lawsuit concerning a proposed PERJETA biosimilar brought by Genentech and Hoffmann-La Roche against Shanghai Henlius Biotech Inc. and Organon & Co. That litigation was settled in January 2026.

Genentech and Hoffmann-La Roche seek, among other relief, an injunction preventing Biocon from manufacturing, using, offering to sell, selling, or distributing Bmab1500 in the United States, as well as damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More