ARTICLE
13 January 2021

Director Refreshment

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

A quick post today to highlight a couple of other posts on board of directors refreshment by friends and fellow bloggers Lynn Jokela and Liz Dunshee.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Winston Taylor are most popular:
  • within Media, Telecoms, IT and Entertainment topic(s)

A quick post today to highlight a couple of other posts on board of directors refreshment by friends and fellow bloggers Lynn Jokela and Liz Dunshee. Lynn's post, Director Survey: Room for Improvement with Board Refreshment, refers to PWC's annual survey of nearly 700 U.S. directors. The PWC report indicates that directors support board refreshment, but don't feel that they are doing a good job with it:

  • 49% of directors say at least one board member should be replaced
  • Only 49% say a board succession plan is shared with the full board
  • 10% say their board doesn't have a succession plan at all
  • Directors cited board leadership's unwillingness to have difficult conversations with underperforming directors and an ineffective process for director assessments most frequently as potential barriers to board refreshment    

Liz's post, Board Evals & Refreshment: Key to Unlocking Diversity Gains, links to a recent Spencer Stuart Board Index, which indicates, among other things, that 81% of boards saying that they want to add diverse directors, but fear it could be a long process due to low turnover among existing directors. Liz's post highlights the following stats from the Spencer Stuart Board Index S&P 500 boards during the 2020 proxy season:

  • 55% appointed a new independent director - translating to an overall turnover of 0.84 new directors per board - which is similar to rates during the past 5 years
  • Of the 272 boards that appointed new independent directors, 28% increased the size of the board to add women - yet increasing board size for more diversity isn't a sustainable option
  • 25% had no change to board composition
  • 16% of sitting independent directors on boards with retirement age caps are within 3 years of mandatory retirement
  • 6% report having explicit term limits for non-executive directors - the most common limits are 12 or 15 years
  • Female representation rose to 28% of all S&P 500 directors - but only 22% of new S&P directors are from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups
  • 24% included a commitment in the proxy statement to consider diverse slates when adding a new director

The report goes on to note that the preferred method for board refreshment is a robust board assessment process that includes director self-assessments and peer evaluations. Although director surveys consistently indicate that there's room for improvement with this process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More