ARTICLE
25 June 2013

Raising the Bar intellectual property law changes now in force

SF
Spruson & Ferguson

Contributor

Established in 1887, Spruson & Ferguson is a leading intellectual property (IP) service provider in the Asia-Pacific region, with offices in Australia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. They offer high-quality services to clients and are part of the IPH Limited group, which includes various professional service firms operating under different brands in multiple jurisdictions. Spruson & Ferguson is an incorporated entity owned by IPH Limited, with a strong presence in the industry.
One of the biggest changes in Australian Patent and Trademark law, created and shepherded by the Australian Patent Office has now taken effect in Australia.
Australia Intellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson are most popular:
  • within Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences, Corporate/Commercial Law and Consumer Protection topic(s)
  • with Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries

One of the biggest changes in Australian Patent and Trademark law, created and shepherded by the Australian Patent Office has now taken effect in Australia.

Whilst the Patent Office received a flood of application just before the changes came into effect, the new provisions are now in force. The significant changes include:

  • a change in the obviousness standard to a European centric approach;
  • a toughening of the utility standard;
  • enhancing of the fair basis or disclosure requirements, again moving closer to the European standard;
  • a reduction in time frames for examination;
  • and the streamlining of opposition procedures for both patents and trade marks, with a reduction in allowable extensions of time to file evidence.

The Office's motivation seems to be to strongly align Australian practice with a European Patent Office approach to intellectual property, without necessarily considering the consequence of such an approach. The value of aligning the IP system with a major economic block has perhaps outweighed any consideration of the deficiencies of operation of the European system.

Whilst the Patent Office motivations are evident, it remains to be seen if our courts will be so compliant in diverging from their own jurisprudence on such fundamental aspects of our patent system.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More